Clegg, a former British deputy prime minister, argued that policing AI was akin to constructing a aircraft already in flight — inherently dangerous and tough work. Harris trumpeted Washington’s efforts to deal with the risks of AI by voluntary enterprise agreements because the world’s gold customary. Ursula von der Leyen, the European Fee president, who was additionally in attendance, urged others to observe Brussels’ new, legally binding rulebook to crack down on the tech.
The controversy represented a snapshot of an even bigger reality. For the previous 12 months, a political combat has been raging around the globe, principally within the shadows, over how — and whether or not — to regulate AI. This new digital Nice Sport is a great distance from over. Whoever wins will cement their dominance over Western guidelines for an era-defining expertise. As soon as these guidelines are set, they are going to be virtually inconceivable to rewrite.
For these watching the dialog firsthand, the haggling within the British rain was akin to Nineteenth-century European powers carving up the world.
“It felt like an alternate actuality,” mentioned Amba Kak, head of the AI Now Institute, a nonprofit group, who participated within the discussions. On the finish of the assembly, 29 nations, together with China, European Union members, and america, signed a voluntary settlement to cut back dangers which have climbed the political agenda due to the arrival of OpenAI’s ChatGPT.
Within the 12 months forward, the cut-throat battle to regulate the expertise will create winners and losers. By the tip of 2024, policymakers count on many new AI requirements to have been finalized.
For this text, POLITICO spoke to greater than three dozen politicians, policymakers, tech executives and others, a lot of whom had been granted anonymity to debate delicate issues, to know the dynamics at play because the world grapples with this new disruptive expertise.
